CO129-076 - Individuals - 1859 — Page 401

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

I must quite see that every successive submission of some of the most recent documents Secretary of State is bound to entertain bearing on the claim, which with page 395

I reopen the cases, my Predecessor, singularly decided upon this matter, which have not been settled to the satisfaction of the claimants. If this were competent on the part of the S. & S. his time would be consumed in revising the decisions of personal cases, of which we have so many at this Office.

It is, however, at the discretion of the S. of State to take that course, and if, in this present case, the Duke of Newcastle would like to go into this matter the papers shall be collected for his Grace. In the meanwhile I shall not go into it.

2 AB. 6 July.

Is there any birth entry relating to Watkins's assertion, that in 1612 Sir W. Molesworth and 20th Jan Oufell witnessed Downing ordering the payment of this rent, and that Sir J. Odell "disapproved" of it?

The fact is as stated Hm 17b 2 M. Watkins Janney copies of the two despatches, and the final one written by a predecessor Mr. Labouchere, who took a different view of the subject from his Predecessors.

Sir E. Lytton concurred.

Edit History

2026-05-18 16:24:05 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

I must quite see that every successive submission of some of the most recent documents Secretary of State is bound to entertain bearing on the claim, which with page 395 I reopen the cases, my Predecessor, singularly decided upon this matter, which have not been settled to the satisfaction of the claimants. If this were competent on the part of the S. & S. his time would be consumed in revising the decisions of personal cases, of which we have so many at this Office. It is, however, at the discretion of the S. of State to take that course, and if, in this present case, the Duke of Newcastle would like to go into this matter the papers shall be collected for his Grace. In the meanwhile I shall not go into it. 2 AB. 6 July. Is there any birth entry relating to Watkins's assertion, that in 1612 Sir W. Molesworth and 20th Jan Oufell witnessed Downing ordering the payment of this rent, and that Sir J. Odell "disapproved" of it? The fact is as stated Hm 17b 2 M. Watkins Janney copies of the two despatches, and the final one written by a predecessor Mr. Labouchere, who took a different view of the subject from his Predecessors. Sir E. Lytton concurred.

Baseline (Original)

myself quite see That every saccepive submit some of the most recent documents Secutary of state is bound to entertain bearing on the claim, which with gine 395 I reopen the cases, Predecessor, fingular decided ley plural this which this Grace an have not been settled to the satisfaction of The claimants. If this were competic on the S. & S. his time would be Consumed in reviesing the decision of personal cases, of this Predempers which we have so many at this Affic It is ota hourver at the discretion of the S. Apple to take that course, aux if, in thie present case, the Duke g Newcastle would like to y go into this matter the papers shall be Collected for his Grace. In the mean while I insight into it. 2 AB. 6 July. Is there any birth in to Watkins's asccation, that 1612 Sir W. Moleswort and 20%an Oufell with to his) Downing ordering the Layment of this rent, and that fir ). Od. " disrepanded" hot arden The fact is as Hm 17b stated 2 M. Watkins Janney copies of the two despatches, and and final one written ley of a perther Mr. Labouches, who took a different view of the saliech from his Predecepers . Sin E. Lython concurred

2026-05-18 16:24:05 · Baseline

View content

myself quite see

That

every

saccepive submit some of the most recent documents Secutary of state is bound to entertain bearing on the claim, which with gine 395

I reopen the cases, Predecessor, fingular

decided

ley plural

this

which

this Grace

have not been settled to the satisfaction

The claimants. If this were competic on the S. & S. his time would be

Consumed in reviesing the decision of

personal cases, of this Predempers which we have so many at this Affic

It is

ota

hourver at the discretion of the S. Apple to take that course, aux if, in thie present case, the Duke g Newcastle would like to

y go into this matter the papers shall be Collected for his Grace. In the mean

while I

insight into it.

2 AB. 6 July.

Is there any birth in to Watkins's asccation, that 1612 Sir W. Moleswort and 20%an Oufell with to his) Downing ordering the Layment of this rent, and that fir ). Od. " disrepanded" hot arden

The fact is as

Hm 17b

stated

M. Watkins

Janney copies of the two despatches, and

and final one written ley of a perther Mr. Labouches, who took a different view of the saliech from his Predecepers .

CO129-076 - Individuals - 1859 — Page 401

Edit History

Comments

Private Research Note